Compare and Contrast of Media Censorship - MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Compare and Contrast of Media Censorship. Answer: Introduction The essay will help in demonstrating the comparison and constract between the internet censorship in Israel and China. It has been seen that China is known for censoring internet for different political kind of reasons, on the other hand Israel claims to censor to the citizens as per the religious beliefs (Tai, 2014). It is seen that Islam is political in an inherent manner and it is the responsibility of the government of Israel to protect the individuals from anti-Muslim information and sites. Currently, it has been seen that China is the primary country in censorship in internet technology procedure, practice and technology (Behrouzian et al., 2016). In the era of changing and advanced technology, it can be seen that it has been difficult for the leaders to control and censor flow of information. The internet development in the 1990s has created cosmopolitan world wherein individuals from the world can communicate and share different kind of views and information (King, Pan Roberts, 2017). It can be seen that both Israel and China follow and practice the internet censorship and there are similarities in these countries than it appears (Abbott Givens, 2015). Additionally, it has been seen that China and Israel tried to create cosmopolitan world around the individuals but there has been differences in the censorship that includes religious censorship that has been seen in different countries such as Israel and Saudi Arabia. On the other hand, political censorship includes the countries such as China and North Korea (Blanc et al., 2017). Furthermore, China and Israel both follow Internet censorship wherein both are rarely compared in todays scenario in the scholarly article (Tai, 2014). It has been seen that while comparing two Islamic countries, it is easier to compare and contrast the similar backgrounds in a religious manner (Kiriya Sherstoboeva, 2015). With the help of the comparison of secular leader in the censorship of the Internet to the Islamic country Israel, there will be different new and different perspectives that can help in gaining stability in political gain as well (Parks Mukherjee, 2017). The essay helped in analyzing the internet expurgation rather than the entire censorship as a whole. The internet censorship helped in analyzing the differences and similarities in censoring the aspect of the entire society that is changing in a rapid manner and there is necessity for the economic growth as well (Franchi, Poggi Tomaiuolo, 2016). It can be seen that China is specific extremely when listing the different information is adequate in the online display. According to Franchi, Poggi Tomaiuolo, (2016), there were different Chinese users who need to utilize the regulations of the government identification as this will help them in creating mail address as this aids the government in tracking different users who post different posts that are politically sensitive and anti-governmental censored information. This has created huge issues in the internet and it divulge different other personal information of the users (Cheong, 2017). China created voluntary Pledge of the self-regulation and professional ethics for China internet industry (Tai, 2016). In this pledge, it was made mandatory that the internet companies need to censor all their private information and refrain from the different posting of illegal political information. Furthermore, the China government created system wherein the citizens report the different websites that contain different kind of illegal information in an effective manner. However, there was different kind of issues that was faced by China wherein internet censoring was difficult in nature. It was noted that when China will not be able to coerce ISP as to restrict information from different dissident users, such sites would be blocked (Tai, 2016). While China is the world leader in censorship of internet technology along with practice, Israel held a policy that was open in nature than China. The usage of internet in Israel was prompted by the government as to provide different alternative means of technological advancements during the troubled economic times (Stier, 2015). Initially, Israel did not implement internet censorship, however the discontent has lead Israel to employ different policies by assuming the different needs in China. In the year 1979, Israel institutionalized distinct categories of the political authority wherein Israel is working tremendously on implementing the system of effective censorship system to control media along with journalism (Gohdes, 2015). Israel is trying to implement and create national Halal system of internet, it is still lacking when it is compared with control of internet in China (Weiss, 2015). Last year, there was huge protest wherein anti-Islam video on YouTube caused violent protests and this caused huge trouble and issues for the ordinary citizens in the respective country as well. Israel has been trying to implement model of Internet censorship, however there were different legitimacy issues faced by Israel like China as well. It was seen that the censorship in Israel was due to the different political issues, whereas the censorship of China was based on different religious beliefs and it has hurted the different sentiments of individuals in an ineffective manner (Fu Lee, 2016). Conclusion Therefore, it can be concluded that it is apparent that censorship of Israel of the internet is political in nature, wherein in China it is religious in nature (Liu, 2016). While implementation by the government of Israel, it was seen that Israel did not follow any such models or techniques previously like China. While in China, it was seen that there were issues in censorship related to religious beliefs and this caused different violent actions in the society in China as well. From the above scenario, it can be inferred that as to understand the different motives of censorship in Israel and China, it is essential to understand and investigate that they are not against the different religious and political views of the individuals living in the society. When the western nations wish to help in promoting democracy, it is essential for them to understand the situation of censorship in different countries as this will help them in gaining a proper and realist power ploy to understand t he perspective in an effective manner. References Abbott, J., Givens, J. W. (2015). Strategic Censorship in a Hybrid Authoritarian Regime? Differential Bias in Malaysia's Online and Print Media.Journal of East Asian Studies,15(3), 455-478. Behrouzian, G., Nisbet, E.C., Dal, A. arko?lu, A., (2016). Resisting censorship: How citizens navigate closed media environments.International Journal of Communication,10, p.23. Blanc, R., Islam, M.A., Patten, D.M. Branco, M.C., (2017). Corporate anti-corruption disclosure: An examination of the impact of media exposure and country-level press freedom.Accounting, Auditing Accountability Journal,30(8), pp.1746-1770. Cheong, P. H. (2017). The vitality of new media and religion: Communicative perspectives, practices, and changing authority in spiritual organization.new media society,19(1), 25-33. Franchi, E., Poggi, A. Tomaiuolo, M., (2016). Blogracy: A peer-to-peer social network.International Journal of Distributed Systems and Technologies (IJDST),7(2), pp.37-56. Fu, J. S., Lee, A. Y. (2016). Chinese journalists' discursive Weibo practices in an extended journalistic sphere.Journalism Studies,17(1), 80-99. Gohdes, A. R. (2015). Pulling the plug: Network disruptions and violence in civil conflict.Journal of Peace Research,52(3), 352-367. King, G., Pan, J. Roberts, M.E., (2017). How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, not Engaged Argument.American Political Science Review,111(3), pp.484-501. Kiriya, I., Sherstoboeva, E. (2015). Piracy Social Change| Russian Media Piracy in the Context of Censoring Practices.International Journal of Communication,9, 13. Liu, T. (2016). Neoliberal ethos, state censorship and sexual culture: a Chinese dating/hook-up app.Continuum,30(5), 557-566. Parks, L. Mukherjee, R., (2017). From platform jumping to self-censorship: internet freedom, social media, and circumvention practices in Zambia.Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies,14(3), pp.221-237. Stier, S. (2015). Democracy, autocracy and the news: the impact of regime type on media freedom.Democratization,22(7), 1273-1295. Tai, Q., (2014). China's media censorship: A dynamic and diversified regime.Journal of East Asian Studies,14(2), pp.185-210. Tai, Q., (2016). Western Media Exposure and Chinese Immigrants Political Perceptions.Political Communication,33(1), pp.78-97. Weiss, A. S. (2015). The digital and social media journalist: A comparative analysis of journalists in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru.International Communication Gazette,77(1), 74-101.